| 
    
		
		
			Fall 2005 - Vol. 6/No. 1
		 
		   
		Managing the soil food web in legume-vegetable rotations 
		by Howard Ferris, Louise E. Jackson, Hideomi Minoshima, Jeffrey P. Mitchell, Sara Sanchez Moreno, Kate M. Scow, Steven R. Temple 
		
		These SAFS project researchers study the changes in
			soil biology that occur as a result of farming practices. Achieving a functioning soil community 
			following a history of conventional agricultural practices may require a prolonged transition. 
			Here researchers describe the importance of soil food webs in alternative farming systems and 
			explore some approaches to enhancing their activity. 
		Introduction – Structure, Functions and Importance of Soil Food Webs
		
			
				The ecological functions of soil food 
					webs include:
					- Decomposition of organic matter
 
					- Cycling of minerals and nutrients
 
					- Reservoirs of minerals and nutrients
 
					- Redistribution of minerals and nutrients
 
					- Sequestration of carbon
 
					- Degradation of pollutants, pesticides
 
					- Modification of soil structure
 
					- Biological regulation of pest species
 
				   
			 |  
					
			 |  
		 
		The soil food web is that community of organisms that utilize one another, 
			either by predation or consumption of dead bodies, as sources of carbon and 
			energy. The activities of soil organisms result in ecological functions 
			essential to crop production and soil fertility (see box). By consuming, 
			digesting, assimilating, and metabolizing the bodies of their food sources, 
			organisms convert complex organic molecules into forms suitable for their 
			own structural and metabolic needs. Materials indigestible to the consumer 
			are eliminated in simpler forms that are more accessible to other organisms. 
			Some of the molecules that are digested may be in excess of the consumer’s 
			needs and are excreted in mineral forms that are readily available to plants 
			and to other soil organisms. Molecules taken up by bacteria and passed on 
			to their consumers are considered to be in the “bacterial decomposition 
			channel” (Fig. 1). Many of the organisms in this channel are metabolically 
			very active and molecules pass through the bacterial channel rapidly. Materials 
			decomposed and digested by fungi are often more complex and their flow through 
			the “fungal decomposition channel (Fig. 2)” may be slower. 
			
		
			|  
			 | 
				   
					Fig. 1. Organisms of the bacterial decomposition channel. A) Bacteria at the 
					limit of resolution of a light microscope; B) Bacteria visualized with a scanning 
					electron microscope; C) and D) Amoeboid and ciliated protozoa; E) Opportunistic 
					bacterial-feeding nematodes; and F) and G) Bacterial-feeding nematodes with 
					specialized feeding structures. 
			  	  
					Fig. 2. Organisms of the fungal decomposition channel. A) Fungi under a light 
					microscope; B) Fungi visualized with a scanning electron microscope; C) and D) 
					Fungal-feeding nematodes; E) and F) Fungal feeding mite and collembolan. 
			  	  
					Fig. 3. Organisms sensitive to environmental disturbance and toxic concentrations 
					of pesticides and fertilizers. Some are predators of organisms at lower trophic 
					levels, e.g. A, B, C and D. Omnivore and predator nematodes; E) Tardigrades; 
					others are large bodied and require soil aggregates and channels through the 
					soil e.g. F, H and I. Larger arthropods and G) Earthworms. 
			   |  
		     
		Carbon and energy obtained by consumers at the entry level of the food web are 
			utilized for growth, reproduction and respiration. Carbon dioxide lost from the 
			soil due to respiration of organisms represents a net loss in resources to the 
			consumers of those organisms, that is, the next trophic (feeding) level. The loss 
			of carbon at each trophic level limits the abundance of predators (Fig. 3) that 
			can be supported by any group of prey. Predators, which may regulate or even 
			suppress pest species, are usually larger organisms. Their environment is easily 
			destroyed by physical disturbance of the soil; they are slow to recover from 
			toxic or environmental perturbations, their life cycles are longer and their 
			reproductive potential lower than opportunistic organisms at the entry level of 
			the food web. 
		Tillage mixes organic matter into the soil so that products of its decomposition 
			are available to plant roots. However, the disturbance disrupts the higher trophic 
			levels of the food web. Managing the delivery of resources into the food web 
			without disturbing its structure in the process, and at the same time optimizing 
			crop growth, may be the greatest challenge of conservation tillage systems. 
		A Food Web Management Experiment: Rationale and Approach
		We hypothesized that continuous inputs of plant-derived carbon and nitrogen, combined 
			with conservation tillage (CT), should promote soil communities that decompose 
			residue and result in a more complex multi-layered food web than in systems with 
			periodic fallow and standard tillage (ST). The potential for lower yields in crops 
			grown with CT than ST must be evaluated against the benefits of storing carbon in 
			the soil and the functions of a complex food web. At the Long-Term Research for 
			Agricultural Systems (LTRAS) facility at UC Davis, we compared four cropping systems: 
			
				- Conservation tillage and continuous crop rotation (CTCC);
 
				- Conservation tillage and fallow rotation (CTF);
 
				- Standard tillage and continuous crop rotation (STCC);
 
				- Standard tillage and fallow rotation (STF).
 
			 
		The continuous crop (CC) rotation had greater plant biomass, more crop cycles, more 
			continuous plant cover, and more crop diversity than the fallow rotation (F) which 
			included a fall and summer fallow (Table 1). 
		
			| Table 1. Continuous crop and fallow rotations under conservation and standard tillage. |  
			
				|   | 
				Summer 03 | 
				Fall 03 | 
				Wint./Spr.03/04 | 
				Summer 04 | 
			 
			
				| Continuous Crop | 
				Tomato | 
				Sudan/Sorghum | 
				Garbanzo | 
				Cowpea | 
			 
			
				| Fallow Rotation | 
				Tomato | 
				Fallow | 
				Garbanzo | 
				Fallow | 
			 
		 
		Although this was a very successful experiment, we experienced some farming problems 
			with the CTCC systems; the sudan/sorghum cover crop had an inhibitory effect on stand 
			establishment of the garbanzos where there was a thick residue on the soil. Herbicides 
			used immediately after planting may have impacted garbanzo growth since a 
			herbicide-free control plot had higher biomass. Garbanzos in the CT plots were 
			difficult to harvest because the high density of weeds interfered with cutting the 
			dried stalks. Cowpeas were originally intended as a cash crop, but since planting was 
			delayed due to late harvest of garbanzos, the cowpeas became a cover crop. Water 
			infiltration during the summer irrigation of cowpeas was uneven in the CT treatments 
			due to accumulation of crop residues. 
	
		| 
			   
				Fig. 4. Total soil C (kg/m2 in the top 30 cm) by treatment. Continuous crop (CC) 
				and fallow (F) rotations under conservation (CT) and standard (ST) tillage. 
		  	  
				Fig. 5. Total soil microbial biomass C (MBC) by treatment and depth across three 
				sampling dates (Dec. 03, June 04, Dec. 04). Continuous crop (CC) and fallow (F) 
				rotations under conservation (CT) and standard (ST) tillage. 
		  	  
				Fig. 6. Total nematodes by treatment and depth across the three sampling dates 
				(Dec. 03, June 04, Dec. 04). Continuous crop (CC) and fallow (F) rotations under 
				conservation (CT) and standard (ST) tillage. 
			 |  
			 |  
	     
		Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, Soil Food Webs: Though total soil C did not increase 
			after one year of CTCC cropping, increases in total microbial biomass, fungi, and total 
			nematodes were evident in the surface layer, compared to ST, or CTF. Total soil C 
			(g/m2 at 0-30 cm) was similar in CTCC, CTF and STCC treatments, and higher than in STF 
			(Fig. 4). 
		Nitrate did not differ significantly among treatments but was much higher in June 2004 
			than on other sampling dates, and higher at 0-5 cm than deeper in the soil, possibly 
			due to the dry summer conditions that minimized leaching. 
		The soil microbial biomass (MBC), a good indicator of soil C availability, was 
			significantly higher at 0-5 cm than below 5 cm. MBC was greatest in the CT plots in 
			which microbes accumulated in the surface layer presumably due to easy access to 
			residue on the soil surface (Fig. 5). 
		Nematodes accumulated in the soil surface layer in all treatments, especially in CT 
			plots (Fig. 6). The Enrichment Index (EI), which indicates the biomass of opportunistic 
			fungal- and bacterialfeeding nematodes that respond rapidly to increases in food 
			resources, was higher in ST plots, especially STCC plots. The Channel Index (CI), an 
			indicator of the decomposition pathway by bacteria or fungi, was higher in CT than 
			ST plots, and much lower in STCC than either CT plot, indicating greater activity in 
			fungal decomposition pathways in CT plots. The EI and CI levels suggest that lack of 
			disturbance by tillage leads to favorable habitats for fungi and that disturbance by 
			tillage, with readily available food due to continuous cropping, leads to more 
			bacteria. 
		In summary, we explored options for replacing the typical tomato/wheat fallow rotation 
			of the Sacramento Valley of California with alternative crops, lower inputs of 
			non-renewable resources, and increased C sequestration. Conservation tillage with 
			continuous crop rotations of tomato and legumes resulted in lower yields and similar 
			C storage at 0-30 cm compared to standard tillage with continuous cropping, or 
			conservation tillage with periodic fallow. Conservation tillage with continuous C 
			input at the soil surface led to a habitat favorable for microbial biomass, fungi, 
			and nematodes. However, conservation tillage will require innovative management 
			solutions to reduce problems such as high weed biomass and uneven water availability 
			during furrow irrigation. 
		This research was supported by grants from the Kearney Foundation of Soil Science and CalFed Ecosystem Restoration Program. 
		
		
		
			• Table of Contents •
		 
		
	 | 
     |